ISIS, ISIL and Daesh: What’s the difference and why it matters

This undated file image posted on a militant website on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014 shows fighters from the al-Qaida linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) marching in Raqqa, Syria.


WASHINGTON (MEDIA GENERAL) — Deadly jihadist attacks inspired by a group known as the Islamic State are spreading around the globe and dominating headlines.

More than a decade into its ruthless ascent to fame and power, the group’s name remains unclear. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have juggled the terms ‘ISIS,’ ‘ISIL’ and, recently, ‘Daesh.’ Several news organizations also use “Islamic State.”

While politicians and reporters employ the monikers interchangeably, experts say significant and consequential meanings underlie the four versions.

Georgetown University Arab studies professors Dr. Rochelle Davis and Dr. Jonathan Brown untangled the complex knot of names.

Islamic State

Members of the terror group holding land in the Middle East and taking lives around the world prefer to be called the “Islamic State” for two reasons.

First, Islamic State is short and memorable.

Second, and more importantly, members enjoy the prestige bestowed by a title putting it on par with legitimately recognized nations like the United States of America, France, and others in the crosshairs of this radical group.

Davis explains that members are engaged in PR 101: controlling the message. By standardizing the use of “Islamic State,” Davis says the words “become loaded with other kinds of meaning and people try to enforce a certain way of talking about them” in the public square.

ISIS

The most common of names for the radical group is ISIS, which can be translated two ways: Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham.

The important thing to remember is that in this case, Syria and al-Sham are interchangeable, since Syria doesn’t refer to the country drawn on modern maps.

“In Arabic there is this term ‘Sham’ … what today would be Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon,” clarified Dr. Jonathan Brown.

That large area east of the Mediterranean is geographically fuzzy, but historically intertwined. And that perspective is the whole point.

“The ambiguity of [al-Sham] goes back to what they want the ambiguity to be in nation state terms; they want it to be pre-contemporary times,” explains Davis.

ISIL

The Obama administration has consistently used the term ISIL, which is shorthand for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

Contrary to popular thought, the Levant is not Arabic or found in the Quran. In fact, Levant is a French word.

Davis calls it “an old, old word” that predates modern civilization and simply “refers to the area east of the Mediterranean that stops at the Iraqi desert.”

Daesh

Daesh, or Da’esh, is a term thousands of years younger than al-Sham.

In response to Islamist extremists ripping apart their country, experts say creating the term allows Syrians to passively belittle the terrorists.

Here’s why: In Arabic, “People do not say USA or U.N.,” Brown explains. Instead, states are given the respect of a full recitation of their names. If a group does use an acronym, the term usually invokes a similar word rich in meaning. For instance, Hamas is an acronym that closely resembles the word passion in Arabic.

For Daesh, that’s not the case. It’s gibberish.

“Imagine if you feel like, ‘We’re the Islamic State’ and making this statement, and then everyone just calls you Daesh, which is not even a word in Arabic — it’s just this weird sounding thing — I imagine they’re probably annoyed that they’re not being referred to like a state,” Brown explained.

Khaled al-Haj Salih of Syria is credited with coining “Daesh” in 2013, according to Davis. Salih and others risk their lives by merely uttering the word “Daesh,” because radicals, “pretty much kill anyone who they feel undermines them or threatens them,” Davis said.

In recent weeks, President Obama, Secretary Kerry and French President Francois Hollande have begun publicly referring to the group as Daesh.

In this case, the war of words goes deep. To capture the hearts and minds of at-risk youth, radicals must appear strong and legitimate — and world leaders are hell-bent on robbing them of respect at every turn.

Comments are closed.